I'm busy and arguing like a dick but it kills me to let shit stand undiscussed sometimes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/12/cop26-cl...in-culprit.html
- Partisan hackery, any large gathering involving air travel will use a lot of carbon. But if presented as hypocritical it will give that sweet anger adrenaline shot to someone who already hates the libs. Enjoy that anger. so hypocritical, with their flying in planes for a global meeeting.

https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom/covid-19-vaccine-trials-cannot-tell-us-if-they-will-save-lives/
- I love how the article starts by citing the website editor as a reliable source, top teir journalism. They say that the trials should focus more on finding long standing serious disease impacts from covid rather than focusing on whether the vaccines cure diseases. Ok... but long standing disease studies are already in progress. Initial trials can't study long term disease impacts without extending the trial. Current trials were run expediently as possible, with follow-up research already ongoing. This is critiquing something that is not a flaw. But works if you're looking for validation to a preconceived view. Feel smart and justified?


[url=ttps://www.projectveritas.com/news/mili...estimony-under/]ttps://www.projectveritas.com/news/mili...estimony-under/[/url]
Veritas is arguing what...fauci was involved in covid research and therefore caused covid? Who cares? What's the long game? Does this change the policy? Does this change the science behind how covid works and how it should be treated? In the end the origins will likely be found. If bad behavior was present, it will be accounted for. Or it won't. Such is life. Either way I kind of could care less about this one. What is impactful to you about it?