Page 30 of 32 < 1 2 ... 28 29 30 31 32 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#514854 - 10/19/23 12:31 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: Trite]
TC


Registered: 05/23/09
Posts: 3598
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: Trite
Originally Posted By: Matty
Originally Posted By: Trite
[quote=TC]I don't think it's the genders and different weight classes that make the game fun.

It's the game being competitive. It's more enjoyable when winning an EFC strap is a huge accomplishment and a #1 p4p is super hard to come by.

I've had multiple efc titles in my first generation of fighters since coming back and 2 #1s. I've either had tremendous luck recruiting or I magically figured out something new with AB by accident. It seems more likely that due to reduced numbers it's just not as hard any more.


Most coaches have great fighters when returning. Matty said Cheif said there's nothing special for returning coaches, but I could show you my Number One's and HOF when I returned in 2019, when there was around as many coaches as now and the greatest MMARMY COACH EVER, that shall not be named lol.


Legit want 125 MEN to come back, because I never got any of those belts.


Chief himself shot this down many times lol, if you dont wanna believe the guy who knows, then keep believing your theory, you can lead a horse to water but cant make it drink *shrugs*


How you drew that conclusion from what I said is beyond me [/quote]

I'm very confused.

I'm not trying to get involved in the back and forth, but when I read your post it makes it seem like you were implying that returning camps get some sort of favorable recruits. Otherwise I'm not sure what you were trying to say by pointing out the fact that you had a bunch of #1s and HoFers after returning. So the response to point out that this has been debunked by chief seems relevant.

Perhaps it can just be chalked up to statistical variance and luck with good recruits.

As an aside, is the coach who shall not be named LCM? I missed all that drama.
_________________________



2017 MMArmy Comeback Coach of the Year - Runner Up
2017 MMArmy Most Underrated Coach - Runner Up

Top
#514855 - 10/19/23 12:32 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: Matty]
Foul Administrator


Registered: 03/05/08
Posts: 5343
Loc: Rummaging for used socks,
We got rid of womens atomweight and mens flyweight to increase numbers for the other divisions. Dont know why there is so much resistance against something that was previously done before.

Top
#514856 - 10/19/23 12:32 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: TC]
Matty


Registered: 10/30/08
Posts: 13447
Originally Posted By: TC
Originally Posted By: Trite
Originally Posted By: Matty
[quote=Trite][quote=TC]I don't think it's the genders and different weight classes that make the game fun.

It's the game being competitive. It's more enjoyable when winning an EFC strap is a huge accomplishment and a #1 p4p is super hard to come by.

I've had multiple efc titles in my first generation of fighters since coming back and 2 #1s. I've either had tremendous luck recruiting or I magically figured out something new with AB by accident. It seems more likely that due to reduced numbers it's just not as hard any more.


Most coaches have great fighters when returning. Matty said Cheif said there's nothing special for returning coaches, but I could show you my Number One's and HOF when I returned in 2019, when there was around as many coaches as now and the greatest MMARMY COACH EVER, that shall not be named lol.


Legit want 125 MEN to come back, because I never got any of those belts.


Chief himself shot this down many times lol, if you dont wanna believe the guy who knows, then keep believing your theory, you can lead a horse to water but cant make it drink *shrugs*


How you drew that conclusion from what I said is beyond me [/quote]

I'm very confused.

I'm not trying to get involved in the back and forth, but when I read your post it makes it seem like you were implying that returning camps get some sort of favorable recruits. Otherwise I'm not sure what you were trying to say by pointing out the fact that you had a bunch of #1s and HoFers after returning. So the response to point out that this has been debunked by chief seems relevant.

Perhaps it can just be chalked up to statistical variance and luck with good recruits.

As an aside, is the coach who shall not be named LCM? I missed all that drama. [/quote]

Exactly this, been shot down but still believes his theory, I did wonder how trite didnt understand how he came across but guess he thinks he of high intellect but proves time and time again hes very far from it

Top
#514857 - 10/19/23 12:34 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: Foul]
Matty


Registered: 10/30/08
Posts: 13447
Originally Posted By: Foul
We got rid of womens atomweight and mens flyweight to increase numbers for the other divisions. Dont know why there is so much resistance against something that was previously done before.


Cos the easy efc titles will be no longer, no more efc belts with fighters with negative records I guess and sitting and waiting for constant ACs, losing them, then waiting for the next, while begging for someone to get online to be the second person to accept (we all know who does this)

Top
#514858 - 10/19/23 12:39 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: Matty]
TC


Registered: 05/23/09
Posts: 3598
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: Matty
Originally Posted By: TC
Focusing on recruiting in other weight classes or genders is a zero sum game. Unless all coaches decide to open up multiple camps.

You have like less than 20 fighters in the efc at most male weight classes. So in order to get more in the lowest (female_, you are essentially taking away from another division that is already low.


The thought was a few divisions die off to improve other divisions, I thought it made sense but maybe I was wrong


It makes sense to me.

The idea of just recruiting in the lowest divisions doesn't work because it's a zero sum game. With current and coaches, there's a finite amount of fighters. So in order to bolster a division you have to take away from another division, have current coaches start more camps, or have more players.

The latter 2 doesn't seem super realistic at this time. So the only way to bolster divisions is to cut some. I truly don't understand why any cares about the genders or weight classes honestly. Is there a good argument for them except for a completionism/collections argument?

Isn't the point of the game to just be the best coach meaning building the best fighters? Gender and weight doesn't seem important to that criteria.
_________________________



2017 MMArmy Comeback Coach of the Year - Runner Up
2017 MMArmy Most Underrated Coach - Runner Up

Top
#514859 - 10/19/23 12:42 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: TC]
Matty


Registered: 10/30/08
Posts: 13447
Yeh but to be the best, you have to beat the best and the thinner the divisions, the lesser the quality of competition, so many efc titles atm won by people who wouldnt even be in contention if they were in a more stacked division, instead they can be the tenth ranked in a very thin division and get a shot rather than no.10 in a stacked division would be of much higher quality

Top
#514860 - 10/19/23 12:45 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: Matty]
TC


Registered: 05/23/09
Posts: 3598
Loc: Florida
I think we are saying the same thing Matty.


I am just trying to understand why ppl care about having both genders and a bunch of division vs fewer very stacked, super competitive divisions.
_________________________



2017 MMArmy Comeback Coach of the Year - Runner Up
2017 MMArmy Most Underrated Coach - Runner Up

Top
#514861 - 10/19/23 12:48 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: TC]
Matty


Registered: 10/30/08
Posts: 13447
Yeh gotcha, I dont get it either, its the obvious way to increase competitiveness if thats what people actually want

Top
#514862 - 10/19/23 12:57 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: Matty]
Foul Administrator


Registered: 03/05/08
Posts: 5343
Loc: Rummaging for used socks,
Remember when just getting to EFC was an accomplishment?

Top
#514863 - 10/19/23 01:06 PM Re: 2020 Suggestion Thread (All-in-One) [Re: Foul]
Trite



Registered: 03/27/09
Posts: 4277
I want men's 125, women's 115 and 145. I fight women's divisions, because they were not around when I was around before. Same reason I want other divisions. Same reason I enjoy FW and BW. I can't speak why other's like recruiting women, but that's just me. I don't think it's just stacking easy belts, as I fight in all divisions with my three camps and I don't find any division tougher than other based on weight, it comes down to the level of your fighter and the fighters in the division at the same time. Being forced to fight Drink, Judo, Blim, Sly, Phreak all the time is not the easiest thing, as other divisions can be bloated with coaches not always in EFC and you are more likely to run into younger fighters less trained. There's less running in thinner divisions, as stacked divisions may require better quality wins. I wish every division was stacked. Which, is why I want the YouTube channel to attract other coaches, and that's something that could be done if someone willing to do the work.
_________________________
Peace and love here




Top
Page 30 of 32 < 1 2 ... 28 29 30 31 32 >


Who's Online
2 Registered (Chitlnz, Master Ponytail), 233 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod