http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tN1fQXWYQ1TshZ0SuZrtlTQ&output=html

my suggestion

without being able to distinguish what titles were won after the change i think this will be difficult

how many times have you passed strike just to head on up to glory?

Every time, but when things change, you have to just go with it, cant hold onto the past forever.

^ Thats why its not a big change. Strike and GEC weren't big players. So many guys didn't go after them.

If the problem is losing points. We still have the same EFC, GLORY, DEL, A-1 points but just add Strike/GEC which have risen to the top ranks now.

Strike I could see.... GEC no. Getting dynasty points now for winning a 1 star belt then doesn't add up.

i get what you're saying gf, but thats the old way now. if a player signs up today GEC is a high org belt. it holds more weight now, so you cant just cast it aside cause of previous rank

Plus its only 1 point.

Yep GEC is only 1 point and its not like people had 1000 of them stacked before the update. lol

Just cut off everyone's score as it stands now, re-assign point values to the belts to fit with the new structure, and start keeping count again...

Just make the ranking for EFC, period.

Were talking about Strikefest and GEC point values here?

It wasnt 6 months ago we were all mocking that '10 time Strikefest champ' who came in the hype forum bragging. It means dick all to most of us. I think if you cut out everything but the EFC, the standings would still look similiar.

You needed 500 pts to qualify in the old system, so that is 50 EFC belts at 10pts a pop. Easy enough.

I mean we're considering GEC point values? I can count on one hand the amount of times I actually put a guy in the GEC when I wasnt trying to win the belt for my collection.

EFC only works for me. For all we know the structure could change again, and we'll be screwing with this stuff again.