Then what about minimums? It can be the same thing for TTT and DBA. Maybe they only want 3 members? Is it fair to say "no cap", but at the same time say "there should be a minimum"? I don't think we should have one w/o the other. 20 members is a lot. Is that not a good compromise?

Well a minimum makes sense. We want activity around here.

Alliance should be able to have as many or as little coaches they want. To start a new one should be atleast 5 still. Some Alliances recruit rookies with 1,000 or less fights and helps them get to the next level and beyond.

OK, so if they don't meet a minimum they are disbanded. How is that any different then them just sitting there empty with no activity? Because their name has been removed from the sub forum? If you think it will force them to join another alliance I disagree. If they gave a shit about being in an active alliance to compete in events they'd be in one (active alliance).

Now, minimums demand activity. No activity no point in having an alliance. if they want that then do not say no medals for them not fielding teams in an event, that is corny.

Don't count DBA out of the picture. Most of the guys are off in the corner drunk and passed out because there is seldom any alliance events or they are put together so rapidly without a calendar of events that most say, "awe whattohell."

I happen to think the following, although who really gives a shit?

1. Minimum of 5 member to form an alliance.
2. Maximum of 12 players. Could go along with 15. Twenty is foolish.
3. Calendar of alliance events.
4. Minimum of 30 day notice before an alliance event occurs.
5. Common agreed upon standard set of event rules. No changes to be made during an event.
6. An event committee to run the tourneys.
7. Two posted/authorized alliance leaders.
8. All alliance events include medals, 1st., 2nd., 3rd. place wins.
9. Minimum number of alliance participations to allow an event to take place. Doesn't need to be all of the alliances.

Just my opinion, not that anything will ever come of it...or ever has. As I said, JMO...although who really gives a shit?!

#'s 3, 4, 5, 6,7,8,9 are just dumb and make no sense at all. You shoulda just stoped typing after 1 & 2.

Oh and BTW, DBA is dead and out of the picture, it has been for a long time.

killing the inactive alliance wont do any good. its not like theres active players that would go elsewhere if it died. if u disband ttt its just erases them from the game completely. id rather have it around for memory and history sake

So, what you're saying is you like the rules the way they are.

wait, didn't we just have this discussion?

http://www.mmarmy.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=320206&page=1